It seems that the pagans of the western nations welcome Muslims to their countries these days without restraint. They evidently think this quite an open-minded idea and evidence of their liberal and “progressive” attitudes. Little do they realize that their freedom to debauch will end as soon as Muslims have the ascendancy in each individual nation.
Western people do not now understand that their freedom to live in unrestrained immorality only exists because Christianity existed before it. Look at any nation in which Christianity has never been the dominant religion to see this is so. Take China, for example. Over the past week we heard news reports that China is clamping down on internet providers like Google and Microsoft. Why? Because that government wants these giants, born from the womb of a once great Christian nation, to stop providing unfettered immorality and pornography to its citizens. Yet, America itself would say it had a constitutional right to publish its smut and do nothing to stop it.
Imagine that! China with its demand shows itself more righteous than the nation who once said it served the one true God. Remember how God chastised Israel for becoming more brazenly sinful than its pagan neighbors almost three thousand years ago, and then how He judged and destroyed first Israel and then Judah? Now He says the same thing to the nations born out of Christianity, and especially to America.
Christianity itself planted the seed of the coming destruction of western governments by teaching that God’s Law was put away by Jesus Christ. In one way this is true, but not in the ultimate sense. The Bible says that the Law is a tutor which leads one to Christ and that the Law is good and spiritual. Jesus said,
“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.”(Matthew 5:17-20)
Yet, Paul taught us in Galatians and elsewhere that we were not still under such Old Testament laws as circumcision and the dietary laws. All of the New Testament writers and especially the writer of Hebrews made it abundantly clear that we no longer have to sacrifice bulls and goats in order to be reconciled to God. Christian thinkers through the centuries therefore began to divide the Law into moral and ceremonial laws and taught, correctly, that the coming and sacrifice of Jesus means that we no longer have to abide by the ceremonial, sacrificial Old Testament laws. But, all of the New Testament makes it equally clear that the Spirit-led Christian will obey all of the moral laws.
Christianity, therefore, correctly taught that Christians were not “under the Law” so long as they also taught that any Christian who is led of the Holy Spirit will certainly obey God’s moral laws. The problem became that Christians took this teaching as allowing immorality and lawlessness among them. This happened because they refused to be led of the Holy Spirit. They allowed themselves to be led by their carnal natures and this, combined with their misunderstanding of Biblical doctrine led them into lawlessness. Thus Christianity itself provided the ground for the rampant immoral lifestyles we see in most Western nations.
The foolishness and blindness of these nations becomes apparent, however, when one realizes that their liberal, “progressive” ideas invite others of a different faith, the Muslims, into their countries by the millions. When the Muslim has the ascendancy over the so-called Christian, will he allow the adulterer to defile his neighbor’s wife? Will he permit the homosexual to homosex? Will he protect by law the feminist’s rights to vote, scream, and abort her children? Will he let the thief keep his hands? Will he allow the pornographer to keep his ….?
